Archive for Rot
May 18, 2009 at 5:41 AM · Filed under Uncategorized and tagged: CEO, CEO COMPENSATION, Cheating, Commerce Ministry, Company, COMPANY LAW BOARD, COMPENSATION, Director, Fairness, Governance, Justice, Management, management education, Management Educator, Managing, Managing Director, marketing education, Ministry of Commerce, MINISTRY OF HUMAN RESOURSE DEVELOPMENT, Ministry of Law, Philosophy of Management, Quality, Quality of Management, Rot, Shareholder value, Top Management, Trusteeship
Isn’t is surprising to note that many a sales persons has not earned incentives for failing to meet targets but still the top management has met its targets…………….Is it the case of too high a targets for the “lowly” sales person and too low a target for the “exalted” top management………Also ironically the managing director PAYS HIMSELF SALES COMMISSION……despite the fact that his job is to increase shareholder value and hence should claim compensation based on it…………..
January 23, 2009 at 9:39 AM · Filed under Uncategorized and tagged: Decision, decision sciences, education, Governance, human angle, human nature, Management, management education, Management Philosophy, Managing, Philosophy of Management, philosophy of managing, Quality, Quality of Management, Rot, Top, Words
More often than not, people who do not respect their own words have to manage using the low quality positional power
January 23, 2009 at 9:36 AM · Filed under Uncategorized and tagged: academia, academics, Decision, decision sciences, education, education brands, Fallacy of top tier thinking, Governance, human angle, human nature, management education, Management Philosophy, Managing, Philosophy of Management, philosophy of managing, premier institutes, Quality, quality in education, Quality of Management, Rot, Top, top tier institutes
Institutes inculcate culture (work culture); competencies are developed by students themselves
January 23, 2009 at 9:24 AM · Filed under Uncategorized and tagged: Decision, decision sciences, education, Governance, human angle, human nature, management education, Management Philosophy, Managing, Philosophy of Management, philosophy of managing, Quality, Quality of Management, Rot, Top
Is it in the interest of the shareholders that the “the top” remains an “entitlement” and not “a responsibility”? The “talent” at the top (and the best talent is supposed to be at the top) more often than not “dispenses” the task of objective setting and monitoring; implementation is largely the forte of those not at the top. Caveat shareholder!
January 23, 2009 at 9:14 AM · Filed under Uncategorized and tagged: Decision, decision sciences, education, Governance, human angle, human nature, management education, Management Philosophy, Managing, Philosophy of Management, philosophy of managing, Quality, Quality of Management, Rot, Top
What is the essence of managing? Making a decision or implementing one? If both are equally important then does the current curriculum in management education have depth in intricacies of implementation particularly wrt human angle? Though any scientifically taken decision can be implemented through use of positional power perhaps resonance would be missed as the talent involved could be dispirited.
Raashid Saiyed
